top of page

Grace & Gigabytes Blog

Perspectives on leadership, learning, and technology for a time of rapid change

Ryan's book cover.jpg

As I prepared to preach on the Ascension, I recently found myself contemplating time travel. As one does.


There’s a fascinating connection between time travel and theology. Somewhere beneath all of our stories about time travel is a deeply human longing to believe that love might somehow transcend time itself.



That longing shows up in everything from Back to the Future to Interstellar, where Christopher Nolan imagines time not simply as chronology, but as something fragile and permeable, something through which love still reaches. In one of the film’s most memorable scenes, Matthew McConaughey’s character falls into a black hole and discovers he can communicate across time by knocking books from a shelf in his daughter’s bedroom decades earlier. It is a strange scene, but also an oddly moving one. A father breaks through time to make love known.



Which, in its own strange way, is not entirely unlike John’s Gospel, where lectionary-following churches spend ample time each year after Easter.


John’s Gospel often feels less like reading a story and more like being swept up into a prayer already in progress. The sentences loop and spiral around themselves. Jesus speaks in these long bewildering passages filled with “I” and “you” and “mine” and “yours” until the whole thing begins to feel less like linear speech and more like language trying to stretch itself toward mystery.


In John 17, we find Jesus at the Last Supper offering what is often described as his “high priestly prayer.” He prays first for himself, then for the disciples seated around the table, and then, remarkably, for those who will come after them. For future disciples. For generations not yet born. For people somehow gathered into the life of God across centuries and cultures and history itself.


Somehow, Christ’s prayer reaches across time itself.


John’s Gospel insists upon one of Christianity’s most audacious claims: that eternity has entered ordinary human life. “The Word became flesh and lived among us,” John writes at the beginning of the Gospel, collapsing the distance between God and ordinary human life. God enters not abstract spirituality, but hunger and friendship and grief and betrayal and dinner tables and human vulnerability as it actually exists.


Which means Christianity is not fundamentally about escaping ordinary life in order to discover God somewhere else. It is about learning to recognize that God has already entered ordinary life fully.


That becomes especially important in a culture like ours, where so much of modern existence conditions us to believe that suffering, limitation, and uncertainty are interruptions to life rather than part of being human. We quietly absorb the assumption that with enough discipline, enough productivity, enough optimization, enough control over our habits and choices, we ought to be able to engineer lives relatively insulated from disappointment or grief or exhaustion. Which means that when suffering does arrive, as it inevitably does, we experience not only pain itself, but also the subtle suspicion that something must have gone terribly wrong.


The honesty of 1 Peter feels important here. “Do not be surprised at the fiery ordeal that is taking place among you,” the author writes, “as though something strange were happening to you.” Christianity does not romanticize suffering, but neither does it treat suffering as evidence of divine absence. In Christ, God has already entered fully into the vulnerability and fragility of human life, into sorrow and abandonment and physical suffering and death itself.


God does not observe human existence safely from a distance. God knows human life from the inside.


Which changes what trust means.


Christian trust is not naïve optimism or confidence that faithful people somehow avoid heartbreak. It is the conviction that even in the middle of ordinary human struggle, we are not abandoned. Jürgen Moltmann once wrote that “God weeps with us so that we may someday laugh with God,” and I suspect that line captures something essential about Christian hope. Resurrection is not denial. It is trust that suffering and despair do not ultimately have the final word.


This same collision between eternity and ordinary life appears again in the story of the Ascension in Acts. It is striking how little attention Acts gives to the mechanics of the event itself. Jesus is lifted up. A cloud takes him from their sight. The whole thing occupies barely a sentence. No explanation of heavenly geography. No detailed explanation at all. The real focus of the story turns out not to be Jesus ascending, but the disciples standing there staring upward while two figures ask them, “Why do you stand looking up toward heaven?”


The question matters because the meaning of the Ascension is not fundamentally upward, but outward.


The Ascension is not permission to disengage from the world while waiting for rescue from somewhere beyond it. As Douglas John Hall often argued, Christian faith is not escape from the world, but deeper engagement with the world in hope. Trusting that God has already entered ordinary human existence frees us to recognize holiness not beyond life, but within it: in classrooms and conference rooms, in hospital visits and difficult conversations, in caregiving and parenting and the quiet, mostly unnoticed work of loving neighbors well.

Which may also be why so much of genuine discipleship appears unimpressive by the standards of modern culture.


Most of the people who shaped my own faith were not celebrities or visionaries or extraordinary spiritual heroes. They were ordinary people who showed up consistently. Sunday school teachers. Parents. Mentors. Coaches. People who quietly carried the life of faith forward through patience, kindness, attention, and care.


And perhaps one of the defining spiritual anxieties of our age is the fear that ordinary lives are not meaningful enough. We fear our lives are too small, too unnoticed, too unremarkable to matter. We want to be astronauts traveling galaxies when most of life actually unfolds in ordinary acts of fidelity that rarely look impressive in the moment.

Which brings me back to Interstellar.


The movie’s true hero is arguably not Cooper, the astronaut traveling across space and time, but his daughter Murph, who remains on Earth doing the patient, difficult, unspectacular work set before her. She studies. She perseveres. She commits herself to solving a problem larger than herself without the glamour of cosmic adventure attached to it.


And maybe that is one of Christianity’s oldest and strangest claims: that eternity has already entered ordinary human life, which means God is not waiting for us somewhere beyond the world, beyond our work, beyond our grief, beyond parenting and caregiving and difficult conversations and the quiet responsibilities that fill ordinary days.


Christ is already here.

And the glory of God appears in our ordinary lives.




 
 
 

Has the "Netflix" era of worship arrived?


In other words, have we entered a new era of church, where Christians choose from multiple different worship experiences, often streaming services from more than one congregation? YouTube seems to think so. Each Sunday, I see a dozen or more churches on my YouTube home feed, each beckoning me to click their live stream. Rather than immediately connecting me to my local church, YouTube freely provides me with a carousel of congregational choice.


The congregational carousel reflects a broader trend of ministry multi-tasking. In a trend that has shown remarkable durability in the post-pandemic church, Americans continue to stream the worship services of more than one congregation. Pew Research Data from 2023 finds that nearly 40% of US adults who attend worship services online report watching services from more than one congregation. Participating in the worshipping life of multiple faith communities would have been unusual before 2020. Among American Christians who regularly worship online, the Netflix experience has now become typical.


Digital church-hopping is here to stay. Evangelicals, Catholics, and Mainline Protestants who worship online are tuning into more than one church service. They're tuning in to local and non-local churches, those in their neighborhood and those who seek a global audience. While the reasons for online church-hopping are varied, the online church-hopper has become a fixture of the church in a tech-shaped culture. Today, just 26% of online viewers watch services only from their home church.


There are two important caveats to this data. First, the number of online viewers is a relatively small slice of the American Christians. As of 2022, just 12% of Americans attended church exclusively online. 22% of Protestants attended services both online and offline. So while the online church-hopper is an important trend, it's impact is confined to those who regularly attend services on the web. The second caveat of this data is that the church-hopper represents a highly-engaged segment of America's Christian population. Religious "Nones," about whom much has been written, likely aren't church hoppers.


With these caveats in mind, we might view church-hopping as more of a challenging trend than an opportunity for growth. As Christians increase the quantity of churches they attend, it will likely decrease the quality of their engagement. This trend reflects a pivot from depth of participation to breadth of consumption.



Church-hopping invites Christians to be more selective, empowering the church-goer to constantly evaluate which churches match their theological convictions, denominational preferences, and increasingly their political leanings. It also invites the church-goer to find a community with preaching, liturgy, and music that is attuned to their personal preferences. This inevitably places competitive pressures on clergy and church leaders.


Given these challenges, today's church leader might experience pressure to constantly recalibrate the direction of their ministry to the needs and preferences of an ever-changing set of worship attendees. It's well documented that clergy and church leaders already resource-constrained and under duress. The Hartford Institute for Religion Research found in Fall of 2023 that 53% of clergy had seriously considered leaving the ministry.


Digital church-hopping may not prove to be the major stressor for all faith leaders, but we can already conclude that this trend won't alleviate the stressors facing today's priests and pastors. Digital ministry has done a great deal of good for the church. The Christian message is more accessible and inclusive than it was before the pandemic. However, any account of the impact of digital ministry must reckon with the lasting reality of "Netflix for Church."


So what can a congregation do to reach the online church-hopper? For starters, continue to acknowledge the presence of online attendees through language and liturgy. A simple word of welcome at the start of the service, or during the announcements, affirms the presence of the digital attendee.


Then, consider what makes your congregation's online experience unique. What might inspire someone to tune-in? A stellar sermon? An impressive organist or rock band vocalist? An inclusive expression of liturgy? Whatever it is, highlight this uniqueness in your digital messaging. Clarify why a church-hopper might want to select your congregation from the carousel of options available to them.


Finally, remember the importance of online worship in your congregation's pathway to involvement. 50-60% of in-person church visitors first connect online, through digital worship, a website, or social media. While digital ministry requires considerable effort to sustain, it is an essential first step in connecting with visitors and potential new members - even those who are actively church-hopping.


 
 
 

Updated: Dec 19, 2024

In thinking about the year ahead, I was drawn to this quote from Oswald Chambers, a 20th-century Scottish minister:

Certainty is the mark of the common-sense life: gracious uncertainty is the mark of the spiritual life. To be certain of God means that we are uncertain in all our ways, we do not know what a day may bring forth. This is generally said with a sigh of sadness, it should be rather an expression of breathless expectation. We are uncertain of the next step, but we are certain of God.

If uncertainty is a characteristic of a faithful life, then 2025 is shaping up to be quite a formative year.

Rev. Oswald Chambers, 1874-1914.
Rev. Oswald Chambers, 1874-1914.

As the calendar turns, uncertainty is omnipresent: in global affairs, politics, economics, and business; in education and healthcare; in energy and transportation. In our organizations and families, in our workplaces and our churches, 2025 begins as a year of the unknown. The Economist identified "radical uncertainty” as one of just 3 forces that’ll shape the year ahead. The other 2? Donald Trump, and technology.


If you're an optimist, you might find reasons for positivity in this uncertainty, looking at lower interest rates, decreasing inflation, and the ongoing advancement of AI. On the other hand, if you tend to see the glass as half-empty, you might be concerned about global conflicts, persistently high prices, digital misinformation, and job displacement due to AI. But regardless of your outlook, we can’t possibly imagine where economics, politics, and technology will be in one year's time. In each of these areas, 2025 appears to promise much more volatility than we would normally expect. The situation is like a coin that’s landed upright on its edge. We all wait to see in which direction the coin will decisively tilt.


Moreso than any other community or institution, the church is uniquely situated to help communities navigate a year of uncertainty. And yet we must recognize that our culture is not one that is accustomed to uncertainty. As any TikTok influencer can attest, people crave specificity and certainty, clear and succinct takes and reactions. So how, then, does a faith community navigate a year of uncertainty? How does one live a faithful life when the surrounding us culture forms us to flee the uncertain? And what does it mean to be the church in an uncertainty-filled culture?


First, we might recognize that waiting amidst uncertainty is something the Christian faith has always practiced. We dedicate an entire month of our liturgical calendar, Advent, to anticipation. The very structure of our life together, the liturgy, knits us together in a practice of waiting for God to show up. The liturgy is a tool for those of us who are very uncertain, who acknowledge that we cannot see what is coming next. If we could depend on our certainty, there’d be no need for such practices.


Acknowledging that navigating uncertainty is core to the witness of the church, we might come to regard humility as a spiritual discipline. Humility is the antithesis of certainty, which can often lead to rigidity and a false sense of security. Certitude, with its assertive proclamations, confidently asserts, "I can see what will happen next here." Conversely, humility invites a posture of openness and curiosity. It acknowledges the limitations of human understanding and the vastness of divine mystery. Humility says, "I recognize that there is far more than what meets my eye."


In this light, humility becomes an essential lens through which to view our faith journey. It encourages the faithful to engage with the complexities and the paradoxes of their beliefs, to grapple with doubts and uncertainties, and to seek wisdom from ancient and contemporary sources. Furthermore, humility allows for a deeper engagement with the scriptures, leading us into prayer and contemplation. As we approach the Bible with a humble heart, we become more receptive to the polyvalent meanings and many interpretations within the text. We become more receptive to the subtle voice of God in our midst. We may even be more gracious towards ourselves and towards our neighbor. The spiritual discipline of humility fosters a sense of community where individuals can share their wanderings and wonderings without fear of judgment, creating a safe space for dialogue and exploration. In this light, humility becomes virtuous. Counter-cultural, yes, but virtuous nonetheless.


Fr. Richard Rohr points out that the church is at its best when it leads with a posture of humility. In an essay on "Humble Knowing," he writes:

Healthy religion is always humble about its own holiness and knowledge. It knows that it does not know. The true biblical notion of faith, which balances knowing with not knowing, is rather rare today, especially among many religious folks who think faith is being certain all the time—when the truth is the exact opposite. Anybody who really knows also knows that they don’t know at all.

In its commitment to humility, the church holds an alternative voice from those who believe that they alone can keep you safe, fit, and productive.This alternative voice isn't that of argumentation or resistance. It is instead a voice that speaks rather gently. It is the voice of one who is willing to listen, even to stand down. It is the voice of one who recognizes that all of us are beholden to myopia, error, and even sin. While the surrounding culture boasts of it's unique access to certain truth, the faithful recognize that we see through a glass darkly. While the surrounding culture elevates influencers and charismatic experts, the faithful proclaim an anthropology in which we are fully saint - but also fully sinner. As the surrounding culture carries into the new year with overconfidence, let 2025 in the church be a year of humility. Let us begin a year of gracious uncertainty.

 
 
 
DSC_0145.jpg
@ryanpanzer

Leadership developer for digital culture. Author of "Grace and Gigabytes" and "The Holy and the Hybrid," now available wherever books are sold.

bottom of page